what should the government not be involved in

If we want affordable and cutting-edge health care, there's only one approach that will work: open competition. Costs of treatment are escalating, and the government's role in health care is growing, leading to a debate about how involved it should be in preventing chronic … Should States Let the Federal Government Set Education Standards for Schools? Taxes, the most basic principle of a government, is practically 100% economy based. Social welfare: It should never be the job of the government to care for the poor. Federal Authority. Adults are free to make choices about their relationships without redefining marriage and do not need government sanction or license to do so. Theresa May is a welcome exception. The Government shouldn't be involved in schools because schools can't be as creative as they would like. And these are also ways the government is involved. One of the earliest forms of government intervention into the diets of … Those popularizing this notion feel this way because they see business as more efficient. The part of the video I suffered through is frankly stupid. The government tells our teachers what their supposed to do and how to do it. We should no more want the government to be run like a business than a business to be run like the government. Many of the social externalities that have been linked to income inequality, such as poor health care, lack of opportunity and higher crime, are in actuality repercussions of poverty and not directly linked to … The government's only job in an economy should be to prevent things like fraud, but other than this, in my opinion, the government should play very little role. This is the job of the people and more specifically the job of the Christian church. Wiki User October 01, 2008 10:27PM. But they rarely give a general answer. Yes, the government should be involved in the economy, because, regardless if they want to or not, nearly all policies have some sort of effect on the economy. Why Is Government Involved with Marriage Anyway? It's not so much of a question of whether the government should be involved, it's a question of how. Dwayne Bailey said on February 17th, 2009 at 10:38 pm: . Although in some cases the government should not be involved is things such as what you do in your bedroom etc, however things like wearing a seatbelt, stopping at the stoplights at traffic junctions etc, these are for the safety of the people. This one does repeal some mandates and taxes. Free market economists argue that government intervention should be strictly limited as government intervention tends to cause an inefficient allocation of resources. Why Government Should Not Be Involved With Health Care. Should the Government Affect Your Eating Choices? For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. Instead the government forcibly takes our money through taxes to make sure that the poor have food, housing, money, etc. Why Should Government Be Involved in Medicine at All? They state no principles by which we could judge whether the government should or should not be involved in something. 1) A view often put forward when governments do something that the proponent of this position disagrees with. In my opinion the government should only have as much control as necessary to preserve human life and liberty. The government should be there to prevent people’s rights from being removed; it should not be there to take from some to give to others and it should not serve as a tool to grant some people power at the expense of others. They say what they think the government should do about the provision of healthcare, about education, about housing and so on and on. This must be the case, so the logic goes, or the entity in … Amash has not released a formal statement on his yes vote, but his rationale is easy to anticipate. As stated above, the federal government has historically played a minor role in education, and in fact, the federal government did not issue any educational policy until the 1960s. Some teachers might have a really good idea about how to teach. This bill is nothing like what it should be, but we also know that the right kind of bill could never pass the House.