donoghue v stevenson journal article

Donoghue v. Stevenson: 71 Lord Macmillan: a duty to take care, and to whom does he owe that duty? Research output: Contribution to journal › Article Harvard Stanton, KM 2012, ' The neighbour principle in the 21st century: Yesterday's revolution ', Tort Law review , vol. Donoghue drank the contents of the tumbler. Introduction. Fellow and Lecturer in Jurisprudence, Pembroke College, Oxford. The friend ordered and paid for a bottle of ginger of beer for Donoghue. Introduction. The case of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 is very important, as it set a major precedent - the legal concept of duty of care.. In Donoghue v Stevenson,1 the House of Lords established negligence as an independent tort and reformulated the responsibility owed by one person to another in civil society. Professors of Law, University of British Columbia. Donoghue, a Scottish dispute, is a famous case in English law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular. Donoghue v. Stevenson is often referred to as the ‘snail in the bottle’ case. The case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 is one of the celebrated cases that must be mentioned when determining when a duty of care exist in negligence. INTRODUCTION On 26 May 1932, the House of Lords decided a case that has been defined not … Peter Burns. The Plaintiff (Donoghue) received a ginger beer bottle bought for her by a friend from a cafe. The revolutionary significance of the decision in this case is in the establishment of a standardised duty of care in negligence cases. DONOGHUE v. STEVENSON IN RETROSPECT * R. F. V. HeustonM.A LL.B. Donoghue v. Stevenson, also known as the ‘snail in the bottle case’, is a significant case in Western law. Professors of Law, University of British Columbia. It made legal history in the 1932 case of Donoghue v Stevenson. May Donoghue, a shop assistant, met a friend at the Wellmeadow cafe in Paisley, near Glasgow. Email or Customer ID. The revolutionary significance of the decision in this case is in the establishment of a standardised duty of care in negligence cases.